Repetition and Visual Media from the School Environment: Strengthening Reading Aloud Literacy in Elementary Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v6i2.2972Keywords:
School Environment, Visual Media, Read-Aloud, Repetition Method, Classroom Action ResearchAbstract
This classroom action research aimed to improve fifth-grade students’ deep reading of scientific texts on soil degradation through repetition-based instruction supported by complementary strategies. The study involved eight students across two cycles following a pre-cycle assessment. In Cycle I, students practiced independent repeated reading. In Cycle II, instruction was revised by incorporating choral reading, peer tutoring, flowcharts in student worksheets, and concrete objects familiar to students, including gutters and drainage systems. The results showed that the mean score increased from 60.9 at pre-cycle to 67.9 in Cycle I and 79.6 in Cycle II. Classical mastery rates also increased from 37.5% to 50.0% and 87.5%, respectively. Independent repetition produced limited gains, whereas the combined strategies in Cycle II yielded greater and more varied improvements, particularly among students with lower initial abilities, whose gains reached 31.2 points. The score range narrowed from 43.8 to 31.2 points, although one student remained below the mastery threshold. The originality of this study lies in identifying a pattern in which enriching repetition with social interaction, visualization, and concrete objects may improve deep reading while reducing achievement disparities among students. These findings highlight the importance of multimodal, adaptive reading instruction and targeted support for students who have not achieved mastery.
References
Alipandie, I. (2016). Didaktik Metodik. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arsyad, A. (2017). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Arsyad, A. (2019). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada. (Referensi fundamental media visual).
Assingkily, M. S. (2021). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Membenahi Pendidikan dari Kelas. Medan: Pusdikra Mitra Jaya.
Bouguebs, R. (2026). From Decoding to Understanding: Applying Automaticity Theory to Develop Fluent University-Level EFL Readers. Studies in Linguistics and Language Education, 2(1), 229-239. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/298795.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., De Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021). Five strategies for optimizing instructional materials: Instructor-and learner-managed cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1379-1407. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9.
Datchuk, S. M., & Hier, B. O. (2019). Fluency practice: Techniques for building automaticity in foundational knowledge and skills. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(6), 424-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059919847213.
Demirhan, E., Orhan, U., M?s?r, M. E., & Be?oluk, ?. (2026). Science Teachers’ Perspectives on Locality and Place-Based Education. Research in Science Education, 56(3), 815-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10297-3.
Djamarah, S. B. (2010). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dogomeo, J. (2022). Dual coding cognition in devising infographics for an enhanced students’ scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 2(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.53378/352926.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. (Terjemahan). New York: Teachers College
Fadillah, M. (2022). Desain Pembelajaran Paud: Tinjauan Teoretik dan Praktik. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Fathurrohman & Sutikno. (2020). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Tarigan, H. G. (2017). Membaca nyaring Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Harun, M., dkk. (2017). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Universitas Syiah Kuala Banda Aceh: Bumi Aksara.
Iskandarwasid &Sunendar. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human factors, 40(1), 1-17. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1518/001872098779480587.
Kintsch, W. (2018). Revisiting the Construction-Integration Model of Text Comprehension and its. Theoretical models and processes of literacy.
Landreth, S. J., & Young, C. (2021). Developing fluency and comprehension with the secondary fluency routine. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 252-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1910475.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa. (2019). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi Dalam Era Revolusi. Industri 4.0. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Mustikasari, A., dkk. (2022). Pemanfaatan Lingkungan Sekolah sebagai Media Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. (Rujukan terbaru mengenai dampak psikologis media lingkungan).
Nata, A. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Paivio, A. (1986). Dual coding theory: mental representation. A Dual Coding Approach. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1574231874901563904.
Partowisastro, K. (2016). Diagnosa dan Pemecahan Kesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Reed, D. K., Zimmermann, L. M., Reeger, A. J., & Aloe, A. M. (2019). The effects of varied practice on the oral reading fluency of fourth-grade students. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.003.
Roestiyah, N. K. (2017). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Rusman. (2020). Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sadiman, A., dkk. (2019). Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sanjaya, W. (2022). Media Komunikasi Pembelajara. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Sanjaya, W. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Setyaningrum, W. (2021). Rangkuman Materi Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Javalitera.
Shahini, A. (2025). Automaticity in Language Learning. In Language Learning Theories: A Student’s Guide (pp. 121-138). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-92210-7_8.
Silalahi, R. M. (2019). Understanding Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development for learning. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 15(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v15i2.1544.
Sudjana, Nana. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sundayana, R. (2020). Media dan Alat Peraga dalam Pembelajaran Matematika (dan pembelajaran umum). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryabrata, S. (2016). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suwarna., dkk. (2019). Metode Belajar Tingkat Dasar. Semarang: Aksara.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and instruction, 12(3), 185-233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1.
Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. Tesol Quarterly, 50(2), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244.
Uno, H. B., dkk. (2019). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: MSQ Publishing.
Wang, P., Liu, H., Zou, L., & Paas, F. (2026). Overloaded minds and machines: A cognitive load framework for human-AI symbiosis. Artificial Intelligence Review, 59(3), 109. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-026-11510-z.
Wolf, G. M. (2018). Developing reading automaticity and fluency: Revisiting what reading teachers know, putting confirmed research into current practice. Creative Education, 9(6), 838-855. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.96062.





