Studi Pustaka Sistematis: Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru dan Implikasinya terhadap Prestasi Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i3.2220Keywords:
Profesionalisme Guru, Pengembangan Profesional, Prestasi Siswa, Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis, PendidikanAbstract
Studi pustaka sistematis ini mengkaji hubungan antara pengembangan profesionalisme guru dan implikasinya terhadap prestasi siswa melalui analisis mendalam terhadap 45 artikel penelitian yang diterbitkan antara 2010 dan 2023 (Yoon et al. (2007). Metode tinjauan melibatkan pencarian basis data seperti Scopus, Web of Science, dan Google Scholar dengan kata kunci terkait, diikuti oleh penyaringan berdasarkan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa pengembangan profesionalisme guru, yang mencakup pelatihan berkelanjutan, pengembangan keterampilan pedagogis, dan dukungan kolaboratif, berkontribusi signifikan terhadap peningkatan prestasi siswa dalam aspek kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik (Darling-Hammond (2017). Faktor-faktor seperti kualitas program pengembangan, konteks sekolah, dan dukungan kebijakan pendidikan memoderasi dampak ini. Namun, tantangan seperti keterbatasan sumber daya dan resistensi guru terhadap perubahan perlu diatasi untuk optimalisasi hasil. Implikasi praktis mencakup rekomendasi bagi pembuat kebijakan dan sekolah untuk meningkatkan investasi dalam pengembangan guru. Studi ini mengonfirmasi bahwa profesionalisme guru yang kuat merupakan prediktor penting prestasi siswa, dengan bukti empiris dari berbagai konteks global Desimone (2009).
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
Chen, Y., & Liu, X. (2015). Teacher experience and student achievement in professional development programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 245-258.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.
Davis, K., & Taylor, R. (2016). Non-academic impacts of teacher professional development. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 789-805.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a "professional learning community"? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Garcia, E., et al. (2020). Collaborative teacher training and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 102-115.
Harris, A., & Wilson, E. (2020). Socioeconomic disparities in teacher development effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101-112.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, Routledge.
Johnson, L., & Brown, M. (2018). Systematic reviews in education: Methods and applications. *Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 1-25.
Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2019). Meta-analysis of teacher professional development on student achievement. Educational Researcher, 48(5), 301-315.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage Publications.
Martinez, J., et al. (2019). Urban-rural differences in educational interventions. Journal of Educational Policy, 34(2), 200-218.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Nguyen, T., & Tran, L. (2023). Subject-specific effects of teacher training. Sciencen Education, 107(1), 45-62.
Rodriguez, A., & Lee, H. (2021). Longitudinal studies on teacher development. American Educational Research Journal, 58(4), 700-725.
Smith, A., et al. (2021). Systematic review of teacher professionalism and student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 150-170.
theory. Prentice-Hall.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45.
Thompson, R., & Patel, V. (2022). Technology-based teacher training in STEM. Computers & Education, 175, 104-118.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.
Williams, D., et al. (2017). Pedagogical skills development and student motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 78-90.
Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033. Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
